Doe v. Integris Health, Inc.
Tenth Circuit rejected federal-officer removal (Dec. 2024); eleven technologies alleged; active in state court.
Active — remanded to state court
Primary source
Last verified Sep 8, 2026
The matter
- Matter ID
- SND-0166
- Organization
- Integris Health
- Location
- Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
- Provider type
- Large or integrated health system
- Court
- Oklahoma state court; W.D. Okla.; Tenth Circuit
- Docket
- 5:23-cv-00728-HE (W.D. Okla.); 23-6209 (10th Cir.)
Timeline
- Filed
- 2023
- Key ruling
- Dec 20, 2024
Key ruling
Tenth Circuit affirmed remand: Meaningful Use participation does not make a hospital a federal officer.
Status note
Remanded to state court; Tenth Circuit AFFIRMED Dec. 20, 2024 (Meaningful Use participation is not acting under a federal officer). Proceeding in state court; no settlement found. (Distinct from the $30M Integris ransomware settlement.) | Third circuit court (after 5th and 9th) to reject federal-officer removal.
Exposure
Pages covered Both portal and public site
Tracking technologies named
BidtellectGoogle Ads / DoubleClickGoogle Analytics (version not specified)Google Tag ManagerLinkedIn Insight TagMeta PixelMicrosoft Bing UET / Bing AdsReddit PixelStackAdaptThe Trade Desk
Plaintiff firms
Source
Appellate opinion Court order or opinion
Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Cite as SounderData.com Tracker Litigation Database, September 11, 2026.